Lease vs Pagdi System in Maharashtra : Key Differences, Legal Framework & Case Laws (2026 Update)


The announcement by Eknath Shinde in December 2025 to introduce a regulatory framework aimed at phasing out the century-old Pagdi system in Mumbai marks a significant and transformative shift in Maharashtra’s housing policy.

This move aims to resolve long-standing tenant–landlord disputes and accelerate the redevelopment of old and dilapidated buildings in Mumbai.

Against this backdrop, understanding the difference between lease and pagdi system in Maharashtra has become more important than ever for property owners, tenants, and legal professional.

……………………………………………………………………………………….

What is the Pagdi System in Mumbai?

The Pagdi system is a pre-Independence tenancy arrangement widely prevalent in Mumbai, especially in buildings constructed before the 1940s.

Under this system:

Although ownership legally remains with the landlord, the tenant enjoys strong statutory protection under rent control laws.

The system is legally recognized under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

Legal Recognition of Pagdi System

Section 56 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 expressly permits:

This makes the Pagdi system unique, as it combines elements of tenancy with marketable rights.

……………………………………………………………………………………

What is a Lease under Indian Law?

A lease is governed by the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

Legal Definition (Section 105)

A lease is:

A transfer of the right to enjoy immovable property for a certain time, in consideration of rent or premium.

Key Features of Lease

…………………………………………………………………………………

Lease vs Pagdi System: Key Differences

1. Nature of Rights

2. Payment Structure

3. Legal Protection

4. Transferability

5. Eviction


Judicial Approach Towards Pagdi & Tenancy Rights

1. Strong Protection to Tenants

In Damadilal v. Parashram, the Court held:

 This principle strongly supports Pagdi tenants’ legal position.

………………………………………………………………………………………

2. Commercial Value of Tenancy Rights

In Natraj Studios Pvt. Ltd. v. Navrang Studios, the Court recognized:

 This aligns directly with the functioning of the Pagdi system in Mumbai.

…………………………………………………………………………………

Practical Reality of Pagdi System in Mumbai

In cities like Mumbai:

 In practice, Pagdi tenants often enjoy stronger possession rights than leaseholders.

Impact of 2025 Reform Proposal

The proposed reform by Eknath Shinde aims to:

 If implemented, this could transform Mumbai’s real estate landscape.


Conclusion

Understanding the difference between lease and Pagdi system in Maharashtra is essential for avoiding costly legal mistakes.

The Supreme Court of India has consistently emphasized that property rights depend on the nature of interest created and the governing law.

………………………………………………………………………………………

The distinction between a lease and the Pagdi system lies at the heart of property law in Mumbai. A lease, governed by the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, is rooted in contract and creates a defined legal interest based on agreed terms. In contrast, the Pagdi system, recognized under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, operates as a statutory tenancy model where the law itself safeguards the tenant’s rights, often extending protection far beyond contractual boundaries. Judicial precedents have consistently reinforced that while leasehold rights depend on the intention of parties, Pagdi tenancies derive their strength from legislative protection. As Maharashtra moves towards reforming this traditional system, understanding this distinction is crucial for both landlords and tenants navigating the evolving housing landscape.